Audit: QRS - Centrophenoxine for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 29/06/2026 05:34 using AI4L / Opus 4.8

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 91
Passed 86
Failed 0
N/A 5
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 All QRS content traces to the ER (at-a-glance to Conclusion, protocol to Therapeutic Protocol, benefits/risks/monitoring to their sections).
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 Speculative risk “Theoretical concern from the pCPA moiety…” mirrors ER line 229–231; “long-term safety unknown” matches ER.
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 “Pregnancy or breastfeeding” listed as a contraindication, matching ER “Populations who should avoid it” (line 264).
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Contraindications/interactions sourced from the ER’s interactions section; benefits/risks from their respective sections; no cross-category relabeling.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 The QRS carries no PMIDs, NCT IDs, expert names, or brand names.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No attributions introduced.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Sober, evidence-cautious tone matches the ER.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢 Maintained throughout.
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢 Presents information without prescribing.
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 Footer disclaimer present; body presents evidence.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢 No advisory verbs in the QRS voice.
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person address.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Technical terms minimized; “age pigment” used in plain quotes.
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢 Compact cells and lists.
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢 No direct address.
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢 Framing fits this audience.
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Protocol/monitoring detail assumes a willing audience.
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Not general-population framing.
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 Longevity/cognitive-resilience framing preserved.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging”. Proper names that contain “anti-aging” are quoted verbatim. 🟢 “Health & Longevity” used; no “anti-aging” in the QRS voice.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language. Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 “Memory drug” and “age pigment” are accessible but accurate plain-language renderings consistent with the at-a-glance plain-language requirement; no consumer-grade slang.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: Card/section headings (“Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”); Gate headings (“Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”); Tier labels (“High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”); Table column headers in Monitoring (“Marker”, “Target”, “Why”). 🟢 All fixed headings and labels present and unmodified.
3.2 All “” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS. 🟢 Full standard span set present (45 spans).
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 No unrelated spans altered.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied” N/A No source ER section is empty; all sections are populated.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 Protocol/monitoring labels match ER usage.
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 Labels preserved.
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 No emoji indicators in the QRS.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Content condensed to one-page budget.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Metadata comment is first element after the doctype (lines 2–13).
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢 ”—” delimiters at lines 3 and 12.
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢 Enclosed in an HTML comment.
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Values trimmed and unquoted.
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢 “er_filename: centrophenoxine_2026-0629-0402_Opus_ER.md” (line 4).
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 “qrs_prompt_version: 26.5.18” (line 5).
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” 🟢 “qrs_creation_date: 2026-0629-0402” (line 6).
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢 “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: Opus” (line 7).
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. 🟢 “Opus”.
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢 “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: Opus 4.8” (line 8).
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier 🟢 “Opus 4.8”.
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢 “qrs_filename: centrophenoxine_2026-0629-0402_Opus_QRS.html” (line 9).
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 All values clean.

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet”. The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed. 🟢 “Centrophenoxine for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet” (line 21).
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed. 🟢 “Centrophenoxine for Health & Longevity” (line 416).
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 “06/29/2026” matches 2026-0629 (line 420).
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 “Opus 4.8” (line 424).
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢 Header contains only title and the standard subline.

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢 Distills the Conclusion (lines 398–402).
7.2 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 60 words 🟢 51 words.
7.3 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 1950s memory drug, age pigment, modest memory gains, thin/unconfirmed, short-term tolerability, long-term unknown, mislabeling all trace to the Conclusion.
7.4 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢 “Age pigment” in plain quotes; no acronyms.
7.5 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢 No trial citations.
7.6 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢 No statistics.

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Sourced from line 264 (“Populations who should avoid it”).
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 Pregnancy/breastfeeding, uncontrolled seizure disorders, unstable bipolar/severe anxiety, hypersensitivity.
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Four <li> items.
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash. Just the key fact. 🟢 Concise; no trailing clauses.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible. 🟢 “(epilepsy)” preserved on the seizure item.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. 🟢 No ranking notation present; not applicable in content but no symbol carried through.
8.7 If no [stop_items] are present the section is left empty N/A Contraindications are present.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Sourced from lines 254–264.
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications 🟢 Six interactions listed; contraindications not duplicated.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Six <li> items.
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash. Just the key fact. 🟢 Concise; no trailing clauses.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible. 🟢 Example drug lists preserved (donepezil/rivastigmine/galantamine; alpha-GPC/citicoline/DMAE/huperzine A; caffeine/methylphenidate/amphetamines; diphenhydramine/doxylamine).
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. 🟢 No ranking notation carried through.
9.7 If no [caution_items] are present the section is left empty N/A Key interactions are present.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Derived from Therapeutic Protocol and Risk Mitigation (lines 269–294).
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Dose, Timing, Schedule.
10.3 If less that three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A Three actionable aspects are present.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 All three cells populated with ER-derived content.

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 ER provides two distinct time-to-effect aspects (memory; acute effects); both captured, third hidden.
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 Memory effects (the graded benefit) listed first, acute effects second.
11.3 If less that three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. 🟢 Only two aspects exist; third set blank and hidden via display:none.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢 Both used sets populated from Practical Considerations (line 335).
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel N/A The ER provides time-to-effect information.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢 Derived from Expected Benefits (lines 142–179).
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢 All four spans present.
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Concise label-only phrasing.
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheticals carried over.
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. 🟢 High and Medium are empty and set to display:none; Low and Speculative populated.

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢 Derived from lines 195–236.
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢 All four spans present.
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Concise label-only phrasing.
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheticals carried over.
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. 🟢 High is empty and set to display:none; Medium/Low/Speculative populated.

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Derived from Monitoring Protocol (lines 355–381).
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 BP & resting HR and CMP — the two measurable biomarkers in the ER table — are both listed.
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 Cadence text matches ER line 361.

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Derived from the qualitative markers (lines 372–381).
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 Memory and recall, Mental clarity and focus, Energy and mood, Sleep, Headache or jaw tension — all five listed.

Issues 29/06/2026 05:34

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.

Issues 29/06/2026 05:31

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.

Issues 29/06/2026 05:30

  1. 11.1 — Time-to-effect slot placement: The two available time-to-effect aspects occupy time_1 and time_3 (with time_2 hidden), leaving a gap; the two used sets should fill the first contiguous slots (time_1, time_2) with the trailing set hidden.

Fixes 29/06/2026 05:30

  1. 11.1 — Time-to-effect slot placement: Moved the “Acute effects / Hours to days” set from time_3 into time_2 (the contiguous second slot) and hid the now-unused time_3 set, so the two used time-to-effect aspects occupy the first contiguous slots.

Issues 29/06/2026 05:27

  1. 12.4 — Parenthetical not stripped in benefits: benefits_low retains ("age pigment") after “reduction of lipofuscin” (line 527); item 12.4 requires parenthetical content to be stripped, not preserved.

Fixes 29/06/2026 05:27

  1. 12.4 — Strip parenthetical in benefits: Removed the ("age pigment") gloss from the benefits_low item, leaving “reduction of lipofuscin” so no parenthetical content is preserved.

Issues 29/06/2026 05:22

  1. 11.1 — Third time-to-effect aspect not distinct: The ER provides only two distinct time-to-effect aspects — acute effects within hours-to-days and memory effects over weeks-to-months (Practical Considerations, line 335). The QRS fills a third set, time_2 “Meaningful trial / 8–12 weeks,” which is a trial-duration recommendation rather than a distinct time-to-effect aspect.

Fixes 29/06/2026 05:22

  1. 11.1 — Non-distinct time-to-effect set removed: Emptied the time_2 set (“Meaningful trial / 8–12 weeks”), a trial-duration recommendation rather than a distinct time-to-effect aspect, and hid its pcell via display:none, leaving the two genuine aspects (memory effects; acute effects).