Audit: QRS - Indole-3-Carbinol for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 17/06/2026 06:06 using AI4L / Opus 4.8

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 91
Passed 85
Failed 0
N/A 6
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 All QRS content traces to ER passages.
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 At-a-glance “proven disease benefit remains unestablished” mirrors ER caution.
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 Contraindications and benefit framing preserve ER strength.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. 🟢 Benefits, risks, interactions, contraindications map to matching ER sections.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 No citations or NCT IDs introduced in the QRS.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No new attributions present.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Objective, measured tone matches ER.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢 Tone satisfied throughout.
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢 Presents evidence, not orders.
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 No directive medical advice.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢 Information-presenting voice.
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person address found.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Jargon expanded or avoided.
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢 Compact card layout.
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢 No “you/your” in content.
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢 Framing fits this audience.
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Monitoring/protocol detail assumes engaged audience.
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Not written for general population.
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 Weighting reflects proactive audience.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging”. Proper names that contain “anti-aging” are quoted verbatim. 🟢 Uses “longevity”; no “anti-aging”.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language. Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 Formal terminology used.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: Card/section headings, Gate headings, Tier labels, Monitoring table column headers. 🟢 All fixed headings present (note “Risk & Side Effects” matches template).
3.2 All “” from the [qrs_template] are present in the QRS. 🟢 All template spans present; repeating marker/qualitative spans expanded.
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 No unrelated spans modified.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. N/A No relevant ER source section is empty.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 Protocol/monitoring labels match ER.
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 Labels faithful to ER.
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). 🟢 No emoji indicators in QRS body.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section with more content than fits is condensed, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Content condensed to one page.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Metadata comment is first element (lines 2-14).
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. 🟢 YAML delimited correctly.
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢 Inside HTML comment; not rendered.
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading/trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless required by YAML. 🟢 Values trimmed; duration quoted (contains colon).
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]”. 🟢 er_filename: indole_3_carbinol_2026-0617-0521_Opus_ER.md
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]”. 🟢 qrs_prompt_version: 26.5.18
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]”. 🟢 qrs_creation_date: 2026-0617-0521
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]”. 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_nickname: Opus
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. 🟢 “Opus”.
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]”. 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_fullname: Opus 4.8
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the nickname and the model version number and no additional qualifier. 🟢 “Opus 4.8”.
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]”. 🟢 qrs_filename: indole_3_carbinol_2026-0617-0521_Opus_QRS.html
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading/trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless required by YAML. 🟢 Frontmatter clean and consistent.

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet”, HTML-entity-encoded as needed. 🟢 “Indole-3-Carbinol for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet”.
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic], with HTML entities encoded as needed. 🟢 “Indole-3-Carbinol for Health & Longevity”.
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY]. 🟢 “06/17/2026”.
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]. 🟢 “Opus 4.8”.
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢 Header clean; no extra content.

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section. 🟢 Distills the ER Conclusion (lines 412-416).
7.2 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 60 words. 🟢 51 words.
7.3 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Each clause traces to a Conclusion passage.
7.4 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead. 🟢 Plain-language; no specialist acronyms.
7.5 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values). 🟢 No trial names/years/sizes cited.
7.6 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results. 🟢 No effect sizes or statistics.

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section. 🟢 Derived from ER lines 262-274.
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER. 🟢 Pregnancy/breastfeeding, active hormone-sensitive cancer, children (ER line 274).
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li>. 🟢 Three <li> items.
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, elaborations, rationale, attributions, citations, study details, or content after a dash. 🟢 Concise; no trailing clauses.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet are preserved as part of the item, kept concise. 🟢 No essential qualifiers dropped.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens that depends on an explanatory phrase, normalize to a plain comma-separated list. 🟢 ER uses no ranking notation; nothing to normalize.
8.7 If no [stop_items] are present the section is left empty. N/A Stop items are present.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section. 🟢 Derived from ER lines 264-272.
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any already listed as Contraindications. 🟢 Six interaction items; no contraindication overlap.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li>. 🟢 Six <li> items.
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, elaborations, rationale, attributions, citations, study details, or content after a dash. 🟢 Concise; example drugs kept in parens only.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, etc. — are preserved, kept concise. 🟢 Example drug lists preserved concisely.
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens that depends on an explanatory phrase, normalize to a plain comma-separated list. 🟢 ER uses no ranking notation; nothing to normalize.
9.7 If no [caution_items] are present the section is left empty. N/A Caution items are present.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 Derived from ER Therapeutic Protocol (lines 296-319).
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 Dose, Form, Timing.
10.3 If less than three distinct actionable aspects are mentioned, unused sets are left empty and invisible. N/A Three aspects are present.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 All three sets populated from ER.

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER. 🟢 Estrogen-metabolism shift, cervical-lesion regression, any clinical change (ER line 351).
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit. 🟢 Ordered biomarker → cervical endpoint → general clinical change.
11.3 If less than three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned, unused sets are left empty and invisible. N/A Three aspects are present.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢 All three sets populated.
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel. N/A ER provides time-to-effect information (line 351).

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section. 🟢 Derived from ER lines 144-190.
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative]. 🟢 All four variables present.
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, effect sizes, qualifiers, attributions, citations, study details, or mechanistic explanations. 🟢 Bare benefit phrases only.
12.4 Parenthetical content — effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheticals carried over.
12.5 If no items of a sub-section are present the respective span is set to “display=none”, not filled with empty-state phrasing. 🟢 High tier empty → display:none; no empty-state text.

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section. 🟢 Derived from ER lines 206-246.
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative]. 🟢 All four variables present.
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, effect sizes, qualifiers, attributions, citations, study details, or mechanistic explanations. 🟢 Bare risk phrases only.
13.4 Parenthetical content — frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheticals carried over.
13.5 If no items of a sub-section are present the respective span is set to “display=none”, not filled with empty-state phrasing. 🟢 High tier empty → display:none; no empty-state text.

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section. 🟢 Derived from ER table (lines 379-385).
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed. 🟢 All five biomarkers listed.
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left placeholder or empty. 🟢 Cadence matches ER line 377.

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section. 🟢 Derived from ER qualitative markers (lines 387-392).
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed. 🟢 All four qualitative markers listed.

Issues 17/06/2026 06:06

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.

Issues 17/06/2026 06:01

  1. 15.2 — Qualitative cue trimmed: ER line 392 lists “Any neurological symptoms such as balance disturbance (a flag to reduce dose)”; the QRS qualitative_item_4 (line 673) drops the “(a flag to reduce dose)” cue. All four markers are otherwise present and faithful.

Fixes 17/06/2026 06:01

  1. 15.2 — Restored qualitative cue: Re-added the ER’s “(a flag to reduce dose)” cue to qualitative_item_4 so the neurological-symptoms marker matches the ER (line 392) verbatim.

Issues 17/06/2026 05:57

  1. 13.4 — Parenthetical not stripped in Risks: risks_speculative (line 579) retains the parenthetical “(goitrogenic)” in “Thyroid (goitrogenic) concern”; item 13.4 requires parenthetical content in the Risks section to be stripped, not preserved.

Fixes 17/06/2026 05:57

  1. 13.4 — Parenthetical stripped in Risks: Removed the parenthetical “(goitrogenic)” from the risks_speculative item; “Thyroid (goitrogenic) concern” changed to “Thyroid concern”.