Audit: QRS - Maca for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 06/08/2026 06:21 using AI4L / Grok 4

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 91
Passed 85
Failed 0
N/A 6
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 Protocol, benefits, risks, gates, monitoring, and at-a-glance trace to ER Protocol, Benefits, Risks, Key Interactions & Contraindications, Monitoring, Conclusion, and Practical Considerations.
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 “insufficient data” on pregnancy/lactation; “usually do not rise” for sex hormones; speculative tier retained for theoretical risks.
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 Hormone claim keeps “usually”; pregnancy remains a hard stop with insufficient-data qualifier.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Stop/caution items from Key Interactions & Contraindications; tiered benefits/risks from matching ER sections.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 None of these appear in the QRS body.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No attributions introduced.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Measured, evidence-graded tone matches the ER.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢 Expert and accessible without hype.
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢 Informational, not prescriptive.
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 No directive clinical advice in variable content.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢 Presents protocol and evidence facts.
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person address.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Plain language; necessary clinical terms match ER (e.g., TSH, climacteric).
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢 Single-page compact distillation.
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢 No direct address.
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢 Longevity framing and monitoring detail fit this audience.
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Protocol duration, dosing, and monitoring assume engaged users.
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Not general-population framed.
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 Modest signal + product-quality risks + foundational habits priority.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim. 🟢 Uses “longevity”; no “anti-aging”.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 Formal terms (e.g., gelatinized root powder, biomarkers).

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”; Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”; Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”; Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why” 🟢 All fixed headings and tier/column labels intact.
3.2 All “” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS. 🟢 Template spans present; marker_# and qualitative_item_# expanded to numbered instances as required for monitoring content.
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 Only checklist-addressed variables populated or display-hidden.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied” N/A No ER section requires empty-state phrasing; empty high tiers use display:none per 12.5/13.5.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 Monitoring marker names match ER table Biomarker labels; benefit/risk item text matches ER headings.
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 Marker and tier content labels match ER; protocol action labels are the three implementation aspects (Dose, Duration, Timing).
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 No emoji indicators; ER “⚠️ Conflicted” stripped from blood-pressure risk.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Content condensed to single-page structure.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 First element after doctype is the metadata HTML comment.
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢 Opening and closing — present.
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢 Contained only in HTML comment.
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Values trimmed; duration quoted for colon.
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢 er_filename: maca_2026-0806-0430_Grok_ER.md
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 qrs_prompt_version: 26.7.02
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” (e.g., 2026-0501-1430) 🟢 qrs_creation_date: 2026-0806-0611
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_nickname: Grok
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT) 🟢 Grok
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_fullname: Grok 4
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier (e.g., Opus 4.6, Sonnet 3.2, Grok 4.5, Gemini 3.1, ChatGPT 5.4) 🟢 Grok 4
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢 qrs_filename: maca_2026-0806-0430_Grok_QRS.html
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Consistent with 5.4.

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 “Maca for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet”
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 “Maca for Health & Longevity”
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 08/06/2026 from 2026-0806-0611
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 Grok 4
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢 Standard template subline only.

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢 Condenses desire/menopausal signal, non-hormonal pattern, tolerability, product risks, and higher-leverage habits.
7.2 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 60 words 🟢 52 words.
7.3 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Supported by Conclusion and related safety/quality passages.
7.4 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢 Plain language; no specialist acronyms.
7.5 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢 No trial citations.
7.6 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢 No statistics.

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 From Populations to avoid / use with specialist input.
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 All five populations listed.
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Each item is an <li>.
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 Concise; no trailing dash clauses.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 “(insufficient data)” and “(not studied as a supplement)” preserved.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. 🟢 No ranking notation in ER stop items.
8.7 If no [stop_items] are present the section is left empty N/A Stop items are present.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Derived from that section.
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications 🟢 Seven interaction lines; OTC condensed to stimulant interaction of concern; contraindications not duplicated.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Each item is an <li>.
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 Concise; severity/mechanism text stripped.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 Example drugs preserved (SSRIs, antihypertensives, multi-agent stack, ED drugs, etc.).
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. 🟢 No ranking notation.
9.7 If no [caution_items] are present the section is left empty N/A Caution items are present.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section 🟢 From Therapeutic Protocol (dose, duration, time of day/form).
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Dose, Duration, Timing.
10.3 If less that three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A Three aspects present.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 1,500–3,000 mg/day dried/gelatinized; 6–12 weeks; morning/early afternoon with food.

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 Sexual desire, menopausal/climacteric, energy/performance from Practical Considerations.
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 Medium desire and menopausal first; Low energy/performance third.
11.3 If less that three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A Three aspects present.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢 4–8 weeks / clearer by 12; ~6 weeks; Variable / same-day stimulant effects not typical.
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel N/A ER provides time-to-effect information.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢 Matches Medium/Low/Speculative ER headings.
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢 All four variables present.
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Concise semicolon-separated benefit names.
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheticals on benefit items (e.g., Physical performance; Ecotype-specific benefits).
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. 🟢 benefits_high uses style=”display:none”.

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢 Matches Medium/Low/Speculative ER headings.
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢 All four variables present.
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Concise risk names only.
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 Example/severity parentheticals stripped (e.g., manic episode, theoretical); (lead) retained only as metal identity in the ER title.
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. 🟢 risks_high uses style=”display:none”.

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 From Monitoring Protocol & Defining Success.
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All seven table biomarkers present with targets and why.
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 4/8/12-week subjective scores; TSH ~8–12 weeks when indicated; liver enzymes and blood lead when indicated.

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 From Qualitative markers list.
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All six qualitative markers present.

Issues 06/08/2026 06:21

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.

Issues 06/08/2026 06:15

  1. 1.3 — Strengthened hormone claim: At-a-glance states “without raising sex hormones,” strengthening ER hedges such as “usually do not rise,” “without consistent rises,” and “largely independent of measurable shifts.”
  2. 12.4 — Benefits parentheticals retained: Low still has “Physical performance (endurance/stamina)”; Speculative still has “Ecotype-specific benefits (black for cognition/sperm; red for prostate).”
  3. 13.4 — Risks parenthetical retained: Speculative still has “Hormone-sensitive conditions (theoretical).”

Fixes 06/08/2026 06:17

  1. 1.3 — Strengthened hormone claim: Replaced at-a-glance “without raising sex hormones” with “sex hormones usually do not rise” to match ER hedging.
  2. 12.4 — Benefits parentheticals retained: Stripped “(endurance/stamina)” from Physical performance and “(black for cognition/sperm; red for prostate)” from Ecotype-specific benefits.
  3. 13.4 — Risks parenthetical retained: Stripped “(theoretical)” from Hormone-sensitive conditions in speculative risks.