Audit: QRS - Semax for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 02/07/2026 03:04 using AI4L / Opus 4.8

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 91
Passed 86
Failed 0
N/A 5
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 All QRS content traces to the ER (protocol, benefits, risks, interactions, monitoring).
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 Cautious framing preserved (e.g., “not independently proven”, “long-term safety is unknown”).
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 Contraindications and cautions retain ER strength.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. 🟢 Benefits, risks, contraindications, and interactions map to correct ER sections.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 No citations, PMIDs, or brand names introduced in the QRS.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No new attributions present.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Tone matches ER: objective, measured.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢 Consistent expert/accessible tone.
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢 Presents information rather than prescribing.
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 No directive medical advice; footer disclaimer present.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢 Framed as evidence presentation.
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person address.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Plain-language framing throughout.
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢 Compact card/table layout.
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢 No direct address.
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢 Framing suits proactive longevity audience.
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Protocol/monitoring content assumes willingness to follow effortful protocols.
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Not general-population framed.
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 Weighting reflects the proactive audience.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging”. Proper names that contain “anti-aging” are quoted verbatim. 🟢 Uses “longevity”; no “anti-aging” in own voice.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language. Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 Uses “intranasal”, “peptide”, etc.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: Card and section headings (“Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”); Gate headings (“Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”); Tier labels (“High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”); Table column headers in Monitoring (“Marker”, “Target”, “Why”). 🟢 All fixed headings/labels present and unmodified.
3.2 All “” from the [qrs_template] are present in the QRS. 🟢 All template spans present; repeatable # placeholders expanded to numbered instances.
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 Non-addressed spans intact.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. 🟢 benefits_high and risks_high/risks_medium correctly hidden (display:none), not filled with empty-state text; no empty ER section requires verbatim carry-over.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 Interaction labels carried through from ER bold labels.
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 Labels faithful to ER.
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). 🟢 No emoji indicators in the QRS.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section with more ER content than fits is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Content condensed to fit single-page layout.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Metadata comment is first element after doctype (lines 2-14).
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. 🟢 YAML delimited by — at lines 3 and 13.
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢 Inside HTML comment; not rendered.
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading/trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless required. 🟢 Values trimmed; duration quoted appropriately (contains colon).
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]”. 🟢 er_filename: semax_2026-0702-0158_Opus_ER.md
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]”. 🟢 qrs_prompt_version: 26.5.18 matches prompt version.
5.7 Creation date and time is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]”. 🟢 qrs_creation_date: 2026-0702-0158
5.8 The nickname of the AI is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]”. 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_nickname: Opus
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version. 🟢 “Opus” is single-word.
5.10 The full name of the AI is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]”. 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_fullname: Opus 4.8
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the nickname and the model version number and no additional qualifier. 🟢 “Opus 4.8” — nickname + version.
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]”. 🟢 qrs_filename: semax_2026-0702-0158_Opus_QRS.html
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading/trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless required. 🟢 Values clean and correctly quoted.

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet”. The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed. 🟢 “Semax for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet”.
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed. 🟢 “Semax for Health & Longevity”.
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY]. 🟢 07/02/2026 (from 2026-0702).
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]. 🟢 “Opus 4.8”.
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢 Header contains only the required title and subline.

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section. 🟢 Distills the ER Conclusion faithfully.
7.2 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 60 words. 🟢 55 words.
7.3 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Each claim traces to the ER Conclusion.
7.4 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead. 🟢 “brain-growth protein”, “stress-hormone fragment” — plain language; no acronyms.
7.5 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values). 🟢 No trial citations.
7.6 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results. 🟢 No statistics.

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section. 🟢 Derived from the ER “Populations who should avoid Semax” bullet.
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER. 🟢 Pregnancy/breastfeeding, children, uncontrolled psychiatric, unable to obtain verified product, not a substitute for emergency care.
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li>. 🟢 Each item is an <li>.
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, elaborations, rationale, attributions, citations, study details. No content after em/en/hyphen-dash. 🟢 Items concise; no trailing dash clauses.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved, kept concise. 🟢 “(outside Russian pediatric approvals under medical supervision)” and “(e.g., stroke)” preserved.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase, normalize to a plain comma-separated list. N/A The ER contraindication bullet uses no ranking notation.
8.7 If no [stop_items] are present the section is left empty. N/A Contraindications are present.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section. 🟢 Derived from the ER interaction bullets.
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any already listed as Contraindications. 🟢 Six interactions carried; no contraindication duplicated.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li>. 🟢 Each item is an <li>.
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, elaborations, rationale, attributions, citations, study details. No content after em/en/hyphen-dash. 🟢 Items concise; mitigations/rationale stripped.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved, kept concise. 🟢 Example drug lists preserved (e.g., caffeine, methylphenidate, modafinil; SSRIs/SNRIs; oxymetazoline).
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering), normalize to a plain comma-separated list. N/A The ER interaction bullets use no ranking notation.
9.7 If no [caution_items] are present the section is left empty. N/A Key Interactions are present.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 Derived from ER Therapeutic Protocol.
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 Dose & Route, Timing, Course & Cycling.
10.3 If less than three distinct actionable aspects are mentioned, the unused sets are left empty and invisible. 🟢 All three sets populated with distinct actionable content.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 All action cells meaningful and ER-derived (250–1,200 mcg/day intranasal; morning to early afternoon; 10–14 day courses).

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER. 🟢 Stroke Recovery, Focus & Memory, Mood & Neuroprotection.
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit. 🟢 Ordered Medium (stroke) → Low (focus/memory) → Low/Speculative (mood/neuroprotection).
11.3 If less than three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned, the unused sets are left empty and invisible. 🟢 All three sets populated.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢 Time cells meaningful and ER-derived.
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel. N/A The ER provides time-to-effect information.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section. 🟢 Derived from ER Expected Benefits.
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative]. 🟢 All four variables present.
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, elaborations, effect sizes, qualifiers, attributions, citations, study details, mechanistic explanations. 🟢 Tier items condensed to key facts.
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheticals carried.
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with empty-state phrasing. 🟢 benefits_high set to display:none (no high-tier benefit in ER).

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section. 🟢 Derived from ER Potential Risks & Side Effects.
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative]. 🟢 All four variables present.
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, elaborations, effect sizes, qualifiers, attributions, citations, study details, mechanistic explanations. 🟢 Tier items condensed to key facts.
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheticals carried.
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with empty-state phrasing. 🟢 risks_high and risks_medium set to display:none (ER lists only Low and Speculative risks).

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section. 🟢 Derived from ER Monitoring Protocol.
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed. 🟢 All five listed: resting BP, resting HR, BDNF, hs-CRP, sleep quality.
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 “Baseline before starting, review after the first 1–2 week course, then every 3–6 months if continuing.”

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section. 🟢 Derived from ER Monitoring qualitative markers.
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed. 🟢 All six qualitative markers listed.

Issues 02/07/2026 03:04

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.