Audit: QRS - Thymosin Alpha-1 for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 02/07/2026 15:02 using AI4L / Opus 4.8

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 91
Passed 91
Failed 0
N/A 0
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 All content traces to the ER (dose/route from Protocol L311; form from Sourcing L353; benefits/risks/monitoring from their respective ER sections).
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 “unproven”, “uncertain”, “theoretical overstimulation”, “unknown long-term” mirror ER cautious phrasing.
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 Pregnancy/breastfeeding kept as a contraindication (avoid), matching ER L291; no strengthening or softening detected.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Contraindications/Interactions drawn from the ER “Key Interactions & Contraindications” section; no modifying-factor content miscategorised.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 QRS carries no PMIDs, NCT IDs, expert names, or brand names.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No attributions introduced.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Objective, evidence-forward tone matches the ER.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging. 🟢 Expert yet accessible; balanced framing throughout.
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor. 🟢 Presents evidence without prescribing.
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice. 🟢 No directive/advisory phrasing; footer disclaimer present.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising”. 🟢 Content is presented, not recommended.
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance. 🟢 No second-person address.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon. 🟢 Plain-language phrasing throughout.
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner. 🟢 Compact card/table layout.
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly. 🟢 No direct reader address.
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢 Framing targets the risk-aware longevity reader.
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Protocol/monitoring detail assumes a committed reader.
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Not written for the general population.
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 Distinguishes immune-depleted vs already-healthy signal.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging”. Proper names that contain “anti-aging” are quoted verbatim. 🟢 Uses “longevity”/”healthy-aging”; no “anti-aging” in the QRS voice.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language. Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 Uses “injection”, “subcutaneous”, “adverse” register; no consumer-grade terms.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: card/section headings (“Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”); gate headings (“Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”); tier labels (“High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”); table column headers (“Marker”, “Target”, “Why”). 🟢 All fixed headings/labels present and unmodified.
3.2 All “” from the [qrs_template] are present in the QRS. 🟢 All expected data-qrs-var spans present.
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged. 🟢 No unaddressed spans altered.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. 🟢 No source sections were empty; all populated with real content.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 Benefit/risk tiers and monitoring markers use ER labels faithfully.
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 Labels match ER wording.
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 No emoji indicators; ER’s tier emojis were dropped.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Content condensed to fit a single-page layout.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Metadata comment is first element after doctype (L2-14).
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but not parsed as YAML. 🟢 YAML delimited by — at L3 and L13.
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢 Inside HTML comment; not rendered.
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Values clean; duration quoted appropriately for the colon.
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]”. 🟢 er_filename: thymosin_alpha_1_2026-0702-1244_Opus_ER.md (L4).
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]”. 🟢 qrs_prompt_version: 26.7.02 (L5).
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]”. 🟢 qrs_creation_date: 2026-0702-1244 (L6).
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]”. 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_nickname: Opus (L7).
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. 🟢 “Opus” is a single word.
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]”. 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_fullname: Opus 4.8 (L8).
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the nickname and the model version number and no additional qualifier. 🟢 “Opus 4.8” has no extra qualifier.
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]”. 🟢 qrs_filename: thymosin_alpha_1_2026-0702-1244_Opus_QRS.html (L9).
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless required by YAML. 🟢 Consistent, trimmed values.

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet”. The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed. 🟢 “Thymosin Alpha-1 for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet” (L22).
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed. 🟢 “Thymosin Alpha-1 for Health & Longevity” (L417).
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY]. 🟢 07/02/2026 (L421), correct for 2026-0702.
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]. 🟢 “Opus 4.8” (L425).
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢 Header contains only title and standard subline.

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section. 🟢 Distils the ER Conclusion (L420-424).
7.2 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 60 words. 🟢 51 words.
7.3 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Balancer framing, prescription-abroad use, immune-restoration, vaccine response, unproven longevity, quality/legal uncertainty all appear in the Conclusion.
7.4 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge; uses plain-language terms instead. 🟢 Plain-language throughout; no acronyms.
7.5 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values). 🟢 No trials cited.
7.6 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results. 🟢 No statistics cited.

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section. 🟢 Drawn from ER L279-291.
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER. 🟢 Maps to the “Populations who should avoid it” bullet (L291).
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li>. 🟢 Four <li> items (L542-545).
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, elaborations, mechanistic rationale, attributions, citations, study details. No content after an em/en/hyphen-dash. 🟢 Items terminate cleanly; no trailing dash clauses.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved, kept concise. 🟢 “first 6–12 months post-transplant or during active rejection” and “flaring or systemically active” preserved.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>”) that depends on an explanatory phrase, normalize to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying the bare symbol. 🟢 No ranking symbols present; lists are plain comma-separated.
8.7 If no [stop_items] are present the section is left empty. 🟢 Contraindications are present; section populated.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section. 🟢 Drawn from ER L281-289.
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications. 🟢 Interferons, immunosuppressants, checkpoint inhibitors, immune-stimulating supplements; beneficial Vaccines interaction correctly excluded.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li>. 🟢 Four <li> items (L553-556).
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, elaborations, mechanistic rationale, attributions, citations, study details. No content after an em/en/hyphen-dash. 🟢 Items terminate cleanly; no trailing dash clauses.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, thresholds, staging — ARE preserved, kept concise. 🟢 Example-drug parentheticals preserved (e.g., tacrolimus, cyclosporine; pembrolizumab, nivolumab; echinacea, beta-glucans).
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens that depends on an explanatory phrase, normalize to a plain comma-separated list. 🟢 No ranking symbols present; plain lists used.
9.7 If no [caution_items] are present the section is left empty. 🟢 Key Interactions present; section populated.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 Drawn from ER Therapeutic Protocol (L309-331) and Sourcing (L353).
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 Dose & Route, Course Length, Form.
10.3 If less than three distinct actionable aspects are mentioned, unused sets are left empty and invisible, not filled with placeholder text. 🟢 All three sets are legitimately used.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 1.6 mg SC twice weekly / 6–12 months / reconstituted injection all match the ER.

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER. 🟢 Immune markers (weeks), viral control (months), vaccine response (around vaccination).
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit. 🟢 Ordered from the strongest/most-consistent immune effect outward.
11.3 If less than three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned, unused sets are left empty and invisible, not filled with placeholder text. 🟢 Three legitimate aspects used; no placeholders.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢 Values trace to ER L362 (weeks/months) and L167/L287 (vaccine timing).
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel. 🟢 ER provides time-to-effect info (L362); section retained.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section. 🟢 Drawn from ER L149-199.
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative]. 🟢 All four tiers populated.
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, elaborations, effect sizes, qualifiers, attributions, citations, study details, mechanistic explanations. 🟢 Short tier phrases only.
12.4 Parenthetical content — effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 “(Subgroup-Dependent)” and other parentheticals stripped from tier items.
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section are present the respective SPAN is set to “display=none”, not filled with empty-state phrasing. 🟢 All four tiers have real content; no empty-state phrasing used.

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section. 🟢 Drawn from ER L215-259.
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative]. 🟢 All four tiers populated.
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, elaborations, effect sizes, qualifiers, attributions, citations, study details, mechanistic explanations. 🟢 Short tier phrases only.
13.4 Parenthetical content — frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheticals carried into risk items.
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section are present the respective SPAN is set to “display=none”, not filled with empty-state phrasing. 🟢 All four tiers have real content; no empty-state phrasing used.

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section. 🟢 Drawn from ER Monitoring Protocol table (L386-393).
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed. 🟢 All six markers present with matching targets (CD4/CD8, CD4+, lymphocytes, hs-CRP, neutrophils, glucose/HbA1c).
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency from the ER Monitoring section. Not placeholder or empty. 🟢 Baseline → ~4–8 weeks → every 3–6 months, matching ER L384.

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section. 🟢 Drawn from ER qualitative markers (L397-400).
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed. 🟢 All four qualitative markers present.

Issues 02/07/2026 15:02

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.